Skip to main content

The D ~ Sense ex-vivo viability assay application in a patient with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma: a case report

Abstract

Background

The treatment resistance is a problem for lung cancer. In this study, we used a vitro tissue culturing system to select a new therapy strategy for a patient with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) resistance.

Case presentation

A 42-year-old male Asian patient was diagnosed with advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring an exon 19 deletion in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene. The patient was treated with Gefitinib, resulting in an almost complete remission for over a year. The patient relapsed after 13 months treatment, and received four cycles of chemotherapy. At 20 months, the patient had developed multiple lung metastases and a solitary cerebellar metastasis. An EGFR T790M mutation was identified in the peripheral blood sample. Subsequent treatment with Osimertinib resulted in a complete response of the intracranial metastasis. By 33 months, the patient had developed a mediastinal tumor mass that responded well to local radiotherapy. By 39 months, an EGFR C797S cis-mutation had been identified and the patient was treated with Brigatinib and Cetuximab. By 44 months, the tumor cells from the pleural effusion had been tested for sensitivity against 30 targeted and cytostatic drugs using the D ~ Sense ex-vivo viability assay. The assay identified 8 drugs with moderate to high sensitivity. Combination therapy of Gemcitabin and Lobaplatin had resulted in disease stabilization.

Conclusions

The case showed that individualized treatment aided by D ~ Sense ex-vivo viability assay can be a viable option for patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma with pleural effusions.

Peer Review reports

Background

The introduction of molecular targeted therapy of oncogenic tyrosine kinases has fundamentally changed the diagnosis and therapy of lung adenocarcinomas [1]. Identification of the relevant mutations and the use of matching targeted small molecular inhibitors has created a new paradigm in the clinical workflow [2]. Unfortunately, the rapid emergence of tumor cells with escape mutations during therapy sets the limits for the usefulness of the technology [3]. Patients with no targetable mutations or with confirmed resistant mutations are treated with chemotherapy [4].

The treatment options for drug-resistant tumors are limited [5]. Spreading of the tumor into the pleural space confers worsens the disease prognosis [6]. The emergence of tumor cells in the effusion fluid provides a new opportunity for diagnostic characterization of the drug sensitivity of the most malignant variants of the tumor cells [7, 8]. High-throughput automated ex-vivo testing viable tumors from pleura or other effusion against various drug arrays has recently become an option to provide clinically relevant information about the actual drug sensitivity of the tumor cells against a large panel of drugs [9].

Here, we demonstrate that selecting a combination therapy based on the measurement of ex-vivo killing effect of a 30-drug panel in a 6–9 day-long survival assay resulted in a clinical benefit for a stage IV lung adenocarcinoma patient with multiple EGFR escape mutations and a refractory phenotype for conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Case presentation

A 42-year-old male, non-smoking Asian patient sought medical help with chest pain and perceived tightness in the left chest. He had no family history of cancer. Upon physical examination, percussion dullness and decreased respiratory sound were noted in the left lower lung. Laboratory examination showed no sign of hematuria or blood in the feces. The C-reactive protein (CRP), blood coagulation, electrolytes, liver and kidney functions and fasting blood glucose were all within the reference range. The serum tumor markers, including cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC) were all within reference range, while carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) had a slight elevation. Chest CT revealed that diffuse infiltration in the left lower lobe, as well as effusion in the left side pleural and multiple nodes, were found in both lungs (Fig. 1A). Non-small tumor cells were found by histological analysis of the drained thoracic effusion (Fig. 2A). Immunohistochemical staining showed that the tumor cells were positive for thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1) and CEA, but negative for prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Wilms tumor 1 (WT-1), p40, cytokeratin 5/6 (CK5/6), CK7, CK20 and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK). Ki67 staining revealed a proliferation rate of approximately 38%. The H&E and immunohistochemistry results confirmed the tumor cells originated in the lung and were consistent with a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (Fig. 2B–F). Further molecular analysis of tumor tissue by the amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS)—PCR demonstrated an exon 19 deletion of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene (Table 1). The final diagnosis of this patient was adenocarcinoma of the lower left lung, T2N2M1, Stage IV, PS score (see vol. 1 in [11]).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The chest CT images of the patient before and after Gefitinib treatment. A The patient’s chest CT image at the initial diagnosis showed multiple parenchymal tumor nodules (yellow arrows). Lymph nodes were affected as well as the accumulation of effusion fluid in the left pleural cavity (blue arrows). The patient was categorized as a stage c-T2N2M1. B The chest CT image of the patient after receiving Gefitinib treatment for 13 months

Fig. 2
figure 2

H&E and immunohistochemistry staining of the tumor cell clusters in the pleural effusion. A Cytology of the smear of the effusion (MGG). B H&E staining of the cell block of the effusion. C and D TTF-1 and CEA positive staining of the tumor cells. E Ki67 staining to show the proliferated tumor cells. F CK20 and CK7 double-staining were negative in the tumor cells. Bar = 50 μm

Table 1 The initial detection of EGFR and p53 mutations by next generation sequencing in plasma and pleural effusion

For treatment, the Gefitinib (250 mg, QD) was initiated, resulting in an almost complete remission within six weeks (Fig. 1B). The patient remained symptom free for over a year. By thirteen months, however, multiple solid metastatic lesions appeared in both lungs on chest CT. A peripheral-blood-based PCR was performed but did not identify other mutations. Subsequently, the patient received four cycles of Pemetrexed (800 mg, Day 1) and Cisplatin (40 mg, Day 1 to 3), resulting in disease stability for an additional three months.

At 20 months, a CT scan of the patient revealed multiple metastases in both lungs and a metastatic lesion in the left cerebellar hemisphere (Fig. 3A). Molecular analysis of the peripheral blood identified an EGFR T790M mutation, for which the patient was given Osimertinib treatment (80 mg, QD). This resulted in complete response of the intracranial metastasis and partial response of the lung lesions (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The chest and brain CT scan of before and after Osimertinib treatment. A Multiple pulmonary nodules and a cerebellar lesion had appeared in the CT scan, which indicated disease relapsed at 20 months after the initial diagnosis (white arrows). By this time the patient also received additional chemotherapy of Pemetrexed and cisplatin. EGFR-T790M is detectable in the peripheral blood. B Osimertinib treatment resulted in a partial response of the pulmonary lesions and complete response of the cerebellar lesion.

At 33 months, a CT scan revealed a mediastinal mass, which was biopsied and found to be adenocarcinoma. The patient then received local radiotherapy (DT: 60 Gy, in 20 fractions), resulting in a tumor volume decreased by over 80% (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Emergence of mediastinal mass was partial response to local radiotherapy. A A mass was noticed in mediastina (white arrows). B and C It showed partial response to local radiotherapy (white arrows)

By 39 months, a solid mass and pleural effusion had developed in the left thorax (Fig. 5). A next generation sequencing (NGS) analysis of the cells from the pleural effusion revealed multiple additional EGFR mutations, including 2389 T > A and 2390 G > C, both causing C797S amino acid substitution, and 2386 G > A causing C796S substitution (Table 2). To counter the effect of these mutations, the patient received Brigatinib and Cetuximab treatment. However, the patient developed interstitial pneumonia (Fig. 6A) after treatment. Steroid treatment was used and successfully resolved interstitial pneumonia (Fig. 6B).

Fig. 5
figure 5

The chest CT scan showed pleural effusion and mass expansion. Accumulation of pleural effusion and expansion of solid mass in the left thorax by 39 months

Table 2 The secondary detection of EGFR and p53 mutations by next generation sequencing in plasma and pleural effusion
Fig. 6
figure 6

The chest CT scan demonstrated pneumonia of Brigatinib. A The Brigatinib treatment induced interstitial pneumonia. B The treatment with methylprednisolone was performed and pneumonia was resolved

By 42 months, the tumor cells from the pleural effusion were tested for sensitivity against 30 targeted and cytostatic drugs using the D ~ Sense ex-vivo viability assay (Fig. 7 and Additional file 1: Table S1). The assay identified eight drugs with moderate to high sensitivity. The Lobaplatin and Vinorelbin were chosen for combination therapy. However, this set of drugs was unable to control the pleural effusion. A repeated assay by months 44 identified the similar set of most effective drugs, whereupon selection of the two most effective drugs, Gemcitabin and Lobaplatin (Fig. 7B, C and Additional file 1: Figs. S1 and S2), resulted in full symptom control, reduction of pleural effusion, and stable disease for the solid lesions (Fig. 8A) as well as a 16% increase of the air capacity of the left lung (Fig. 8B).

Fig. 7
figure 7

D~Sense ex-vivo viability assay was performed and identified new strategy of combination therapy. A and C The isolated tumor cells from the effusion were conducted ex-vivo survival test under different concentration of multiple drugs. The ranking shows the killing efficiency (KE%). B The ratio of viable cells in different drug concentration were detected

Fig. 8
figure 8

Therapeutic effects of the drugs selected by D~Sense assay in patient. A CT scan images before and after the combination therapy of Gemcitabine and Lobaplatin. B The 3D reconstituted lung airspace images before and after the combination therapy of Gemcitabine and Lobaplatin. showing a 16% increase of volume after therapy

Discussion and conclusions

Identification and targeting cancer driver mutations has become the cornerstone of modern therapy for lung adenocarcinomas [12]. Despite the rapid progress in molecular diagnostic procedures and the emergence of new mutation-specific targeted drugs, relapse after successful temporary disease control is more the rule than an exception. Treating a genetically diverse tumor with single pharmacological agents has a very high likelihood of selecting out resistant variants, thus rendering even the most sophisticated targeted therapy ineffective in the long run.

An additional option to find potentially effective drugs is to directly expose isolated tumor cells in ex-vivo assays [13]. D ~ Sense assay is an improved, fully automated version of a clinical diagnostic assay that we have developed during the past decade [14,15,16,17]. The assay provides highly reproducible, robust measurement of drug-induced cytotoxicity on a single cell level using triplicates of the four-step drug dilution series. The drugs are tested in a concentration range that is proportional to the clinical dose and achievable in the in vivo tumor tissue. The 384 well pre-printed drug plates allow for simultaneous testing and ranking of 30 anti-cancer agents. A unique feature of the assay is that it is performed in a hermetically closed, protein-rich, reducing environment that closely mimics the hypoxic interstitial fluid of the tumor tissue. The viability detection is based on the fluorescence detection of intact chromatin. The fixation, staining and quenching for unbound fluorescence is performed in a single step without the need of washing or fluid exchange. D ~ Sense assay applies for samples where the tumor cells are growing in suspension form, such as leukemias, lymphomas, and tumor cells in serous effusions. The assay is intended for patients who have exhausted conventional and targeted protocols. Tumors undergo intricate genetic and epigenetic evolution, which consistently leads to variant drug resistance. These variances can differ in genetic composition at different sites. Considering the adaptive tumor cells have the ability to freely invade in the body cavity effusions. The fast proliferating cancer cells in these fluids can be considered the pinnacle of cancer progression, which with a representation of more and more aggressive phenotype. With the primary site tissue histology diagnosis, we used effusion cytology to testify the tumor cells with aggressive behaviour than their counterparts still growing in solid forms.

Here, we demonstrate successful disease control for a period of almost four years in a patient with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma (Fig. 9). Initially, therapy was guided by targetable mutations of EGFR, and a successive series of three TK inhibitors (gefitinib, osimertinib, brigatinib) were employed in adaptation to the emergence of escape mutations. In the absence of molecular guidance, conventional chemotherapy (pemetrexed and cisplatin), anti-angiogenesis therapy (cetuximab) as well as focal irradiation were used.

Fig. 9
figure 9

The clinical timeline of the case

When all options of mutation based targeted therapy were exhausted, the ex-vivo drug sensitivity testing provided additional treatment possibilities. The combination of the two most effective drugs resulted in a reduction in the tumor mass and an increase in the lung aeration. In addition, full symptom control was achieved. However, we did not further follow up the patient after his symptom was fully controlled in this study. We have an ongoing case series study to continue to use this assay in patients with different tumor in advanced stages. The follow-up study is conducting in this series of patients. Also, in this one case report, we could not quantify the correlation between the drug sensitivity after D ~ Sense scanning and the treatment effect. We need to include larger patient population to confirm that the drugs selected by D ~ Sense assay is effective in most patients. Further follow-up studies, including progression free survival and overall survival will be conducted to resolve the limitations in this study.

The D ~ Sense is a highly throughout and replicable drug sensitivity assay for tumor patients. With this customized treatment selection system, patients who have exhausted conventional and targeted protocols could receive practicable treatment.

Availability of data and materials

All the drug sensitivity measurement data including the raw and processed images, the two levels zoom mosaics, the drug titration charts and killing efficiency rankings are available through contacting the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

ARMS-PCR:

Amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction

ALK:

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase

CEA:

Carcinoembryonic antigen

CRP:

C-reactive protein

CK:

Cytokeratin

CT:

Computer tomography

CYFRA21-1:

Cytokeratin 19 fragment

EGFR:

Epithelial growth factor receptor

H&E:

Hematoxylin–eosin staining

MGG:

May-Grunwald Giemsa staining

NSE:

Neuron specific enolase

PSA:

Prostate-specific antigen

PS score:

Scale of performance status

QD:

Once a day

SCC:

Squamous cell carcinoma antigen

TK:

Tyrosine kinase

TTF-1:

Thyroid transcription factor 1

WT-1:

Wilms tumor 1

References

  1. Oberndorfer F, Mullauer L. Molecular pathology of lung cancer: current status and perspectives. Curr Opin Oncol. 2018;30:69–76. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/CCO.0000000000000429.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Roeper J, Griesinger F. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: what is the preferred first-line therapy? Curr Opin Oncol. 2019;31:1–7. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/cco.0000000000000495.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boumahdi S, de Sauvage FJ. The great escape: tumour cell plasticity in resistance to targeted therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020;19:39–56. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/s41573-019-0044-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pirker R. Chemotherapy remains a cornerstone in the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer. Curr Opin Oncol. 2020;32:63–7. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/CCO.0000000000000592.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zito Marino F, Bianco R, Accardo M, et al. Molecular heterogeneity in lung cancer: from mechanisms of origin to clinical implications. Int J Med Sci. 2019;16:981–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.7150/ijms.34739.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Davidson B, Firat P, Michael CW. Serous effusions: etiology, diagnosis, prognosis and therapy. Berlin: Springer; 2018.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Karekla E, Liao WJ, Sharp B, et al. Ex-vivo explant cultures of non-small cell lung carcinoma enable evaluation of primary tumor responses to anticancer therapy. Cancer Res. 2017;77:2029–39. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1121.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Di Liello R, Ciaramella V, Barra G, et al. Ex-vivo lung cancer spheroids resemble treatment response of a patient with NSCLC to chemotherapy and immunotherapy: case report and translational study. ESMO Open. 2019;4:e000536. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000536.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Otvos R, Szulkin A, Hillerdal CO, et al. Drug sensitivity profiling and molecular characteristics of cells from pleural effusions of patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Genes Cancer. 2015;6:119–28. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.18632/genesandcancer.56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Szulkin A, Otvos R, Hillerdal CO, et al. Characterization and drug sensitivity profiling of primary malignant mesothelioma cells from pleural effusions. BMC Cancer. 2014;14(709):6. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/1471-2407-14-709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. West H, Jin JO. Performance status in patients with cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:998–998. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Costa DB. More than just an oncogene translocation and a kinase inhibitor: Kevin’s story. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:110–2. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1200/jco.2011.39.4486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim M, Mun H, Sung CO, et al. Patient-derived lung cancer organoids as in vitro cancer models for therapeutic screening. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3991. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/s41467-019-11867-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Sylvan SE, Skribek H, Norin S, et al. Sensitivity of chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells to small targeted therapeutic molecules: an in vitro comparative study. Exp Hematol. 2016;44:38-49.e31. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.exphem.2015.08.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Markasz L, Stuber G, Flaberg E, et al. Cytotoxic drug sensitivity of Epstein-Barr virus transformed lymphoblastoid B-cells. BMC Cancer. 2006;6:265. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/1471-2407-6-265.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Otvös R, Skribek H, Kis LL, et al. Drug sensitivity patterns of HHV8 carrying body cavity lymphoma cell lines. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:441. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/1471-2407-11-441.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Skribek H, Otvos R, Flaberg E, et al. Chronic lymphoid leukemia cells are highly sensitive to the combination of prednisolone and daunorubicin, but much less to doxorubicin or epirubicin. Exp Hematol. 2010;38:1219–30. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.exphem.2010.09.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Mikael Björnstedt and Dr. Attila Szakos at the Department of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital and Professor Yihai Cao at Karolinska Institutet for their valuable comments and advice.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Karolinska Institute. Szekely’s lab is supported by the Karolinska Institutet Research Fond. This study is support by the Nanjing 345 overseas high-level talent program, the General Program of Medical Research Project of Jiangsu Health and Family Planning Commission (No.H2018030).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LS generated idea, created the D ~ Sense assay, supervised the laboratory activities, wrote, and edited manuscript. YZ performed the diagnosis and the clinical treatment, wrote, and edited the manuscript. XW designed the drug regimens, wrote, and edited the manuscript. PH, JW and XG analyzed the data, and edited the manuscript. MB and RÖ developed the laboratory assay. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laszlo Szekely.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Our institution does not require ethical approval for reporting individual cases or case series.

Consent for publications

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

All authors claim no competing interests related to this work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

: Fig. S1. The digitally processed images of Lobaplatin on the D~Sense drug system. The composited images showed the effect of Lobaplatin on the series of digitally processed images (top) and the raw images from selected wells treated with the highest (left) and lowest (right) drug concentrations. Fig. S2. The assay reliability report. The assay reliability scores illustrating the robustness of the measurements and calculations. Fig S3. The digitally processed images of the 384 wells of the D~Sense drug plate. A Zoomable mosaic of the digitally processed images of the 384 wells of the D~Sense drug plate showing the fluorescence signal of the surviving cells on triplicate lines of 4 steps drug dilutions. B Thirty tested drugs and concentration (μM). Table S1. The drug concentrations (μM) of 30 candidates were used in the assay.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Wu, X., He, P. et al. The D ~ Sense ex-vivo viability assay application in a patient with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma: a case report. J Med Case Reports 17, 529 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13256-023-04277-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13256-023-04277-2

Keywords