Skip to main content

Effects of dry needling on spasticity, cortical excitability, and range of motion in a patient with multiple sclerosis: a case report

Abstract

Background

Dry needling is an intervention used by physiotherapists to manage muscle spasticity. We report the effects of three sessions of dry needling on ankle plantar flexor muscle spasticity and cortical excitability in a patient with multiple sclerosis.

Case presentation

The patient was a 40-year-old Iranian woman with an 11-year history of multiple sclerosis. The study outcomes were measured by the modified modified Ashworth scale, transcranial magnetic stimulation parameters, and active and passive ankle range of motion. They were assessed before (T0), after three sessions of dry needling (T1), and at 2-week follow-up (T2). Our result showed: the modified modified Ashworth scale was improved at T2 from, 2 to 1. The resting motor threshold decreased from 63 to 61 and 57 at T1 and T2, respectively. The single test motor evokes potential increased from 76.2 to 78.3. The short intracortical inhibition increased from 23.6 to 35.4 at T2. The intracortical facilitation increased from 52 to 76 at T2. The ankle active and passive dorsiflexion ROM increased ~ 10° and ~ 6° at T2, respectively.

Conclusion

This case study presented a patient with multiple sclerosis who underwent dry needling of ankle plantar flexors with severe spasticity, and highlighted the successful use of dry needling in the management of spasticity, ankle dorsiflexion, and cortical excitability. Further rigorous investigations are warranted, employing randomized controlled trials with a sufficient sample of patients with multiple sclerosis.

Trial registration IRCT20230206057343N1, registered 9 February 2023, https://en.irct.ir/trial/68454

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Spasticity is one of the most common symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) [1]. It has been reported that approximately 97% of patients with MS have lower extremity spasticity, especially in the hip flexors and adductors, as well as in the knee flexors and ankle plantar flexors [2, 3]. Among the muscles of the lower extremities, several studies have shown that the triceps surae has an important function in balance and gait [4, 5]. Untreated spastic calf muscles can result in functional limitation with pain, limited joint mobility, and gait disturbance [6].

Dry needling (DN) was primarily used for musculoskeletal problems [7]. Today, it is also used to improve spasticity and the range of motion (ROM) in neurological conditions such as stroke, spinal cord injury, and MS [8,9,10]. The mechanisms by which DN can reduce spasticity is not completely known [11]. One possible is that DN regulates neuronal activity in the levels of spinal cord [12] or supraspinal centers [13, 14]. Recently, studies have shown that DN influences brain activity using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) [15, 16]. However, the effect of DN on cortical excitability is unclear. Cortical excitability reflects the responsiveness and response selectivity of cortical neurons to stimuli, reflects the reactivity and response specificity of neurons, and is therefore a fundamental aspect of human brain function [17]. Cortical excitability can be measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in several studies [18, 19]. TMS is a non-invasive technique to assess cortical changes and neuromodulation, especially in neurological diseases [20].

This case study uses TMS to evaluate the effects of three sessions of DN on cortical excitability as well as spasticity, and ankle range of motion (ROM) in a patient with relapsing–remitting MS.

Case presentation

The patient was an Iranian 40-year-old woman who had a history of 11 years of relapsing–remitting MS and an expanded disability status scale (EDSS) of 2, and was able to walk independently. She had not experienced a relapse during the past 6 months. She complained of spasticity and functional impairment in her right lower extremity despite receiving physiotherapy, exercise therapy, and medication to alleviate spasticity. She had no history of comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, psychological problems, or familial diseases, and no contraindications for DN [21]. Her latest MRI report showed multiple plaques in cervical spinal cord and brain. The study was approved by the research ethics committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. The patient has given written and informed consent for the publication of this report and any accompanying images.

Spasticity

Right leg plantar flexor spasticity was assessed by the Persian version of modified modified Ashworth scale (MMAS), a valid and reliable scale that rates the intensity of spasticity on a scale of 0–4 [22, 23]. With patient in a supine position and the legs extended, the physiotherapist passively moved the ankle from maximal plantarflexion to maximal dorsiflexion during 1 second counting one thousand and one and scored the resistance to passive stretch. (The patient has spasticity bilaterally in lower limbs, but right-side spasticity is more than the left).

Passive and active ROM

Passive and active ROM of ankle dorsiflexion was measured using an ankle biplane goniometer (A Bissell Health Care, model 7524, USA) in the supine position, with the knee extended. Maximum passive ROM (PROM) was assessed by physiotherapist while passively moving the ankle to maximum dorsiflexion. Active ROM (AROM) was measured while the patient actively performed the dorsi flexion [24].

Cortical excitability

Cortical excitability was assessed using motor-evoked potential (MEP), short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF). MEP represents the global excitability of the cortex, spinal, and corticospinal pathways [25]. SICI and ICF are well-known paired-pulse TMS that are used for investigating intracortical circuits in the motor cortex [26]. The resting motor threshold (RMT), expressed as a percentage of maximal stimulus output (%MSO), was measured using MagPro (MAG venture TMS, Denmark). The stimulation target location was fine-tuned for the patient to stimulate the right plantar muscle hotspot by an 8-shaped coil (coil head dimensions: 170 × 113 × 17.34 mm) defined as the optimal location for MEP in the contralateral spastic plantar flexor at the lowest stimulation intensity. MEP was recorded from soleus muscle electromyography (EMG) recordings (Seniam.org). The active and reference electrodes (20 mm apart) were placed on the main soleus muscle bulk near the motor point of the soleus muscle, located between the medial condyle of the femur and the medial malleolus. The electrodes were positioned at the ankle (around the medial malleolus (Fig. 1). The RMT was defined as the minimum TMS intensity required to produce detectable MEP amplitudes above 50 mv from background EMG in at least five out of ten trials. SICI refers to the phenomenon in which a subthreshold conditioning stimulus (CS) suppresses MEPs evoked by a subsequent suprathreshold test stimulus (TS) with a 3-ms inter-stimulus interval (ISI). ICF is a phenomenon of increased cortical excitability induced by conditioning stimuli and was assessed by test stimuli in a conditioning test paradigm. It was generated when a subthreshold CS occurs and stimulates MEPs evoked by a suprathreshold TS with an ISI of 13 ms (msec).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Electromyography electrodes for soleus muscle motor evoked potential record

Intervention

We used a 0.3 mm × 50 mm (Korea) disposable stainless steel needle. A fast-in-fast-out technique was followed, and heads of gastrocnemius and soleus muscles were needled each for 1 minute (total 3 minutes). One DN session per week for 3 weeks was performed, and follow-up was carried out 2 weeks later (Fig. 2). For the gastrocnemius and soleus muscle, a line from the popliteal crease to the heel was drawn. This line was divided into three equal parts, and for the medial head of gastrocnemius about 2 cm medial from the middle of the proximal segment and about 2 cm lateral for the medial and lateral heads of gastrocnemius were needled [24]. For the soleus muscle, the middle segment of the line was also divided into three parts, and the needle was inserted about 2–3 cm lateral in the lower third part of the middle segment [27] (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Timeline of interventions and assessments

Fig. 3
figure 3

Points for dry needling of the gastrocnemius (A) and soleus (B)

Results

The spasticity of ankle plantar flexors decreased from 2 to 1 at T1 and remained unchanged at T2. Active dorsiflexion ROM increased after DN from 10° to 20° and passive dorsiflexion increased from 12° to 18°. The RMT decreased from 63 to 61 at T1 and 57 at T2. The changes in SICI were from 23.6 at T0 to 67.9 at T1 and 35.4 at T2. The ICF increased from 52 at T0 to 137 at T1 and 76 at T2. Table 1 presents the results before and after the intervention.

Table 1 Changes in measured parameters

Discussion

In this case study involving a patient with MS, after three DN sessions targeting ankle plantar flexors, clinical and TMS measures improved. There was a decrease in RMT, accompanied by an increase in MEP amplitude. Changes in ICF indicated an increase in intracortical facilitation. Notably, the heightened cortical excitability persisted for 2 weeks following DN. These findings may be explained by the dual impact of DN, which excites the motor cortex through both peripheral sensory inputs and intracortical mechanisms [28, 29]. The DN, offering somatosensory conditioning stimulus, can generate excitability in the motor cortex through direct impact or cutaneous input from the spastic plantar flexor muscles, manifesting at short latency [28,29,30]. There is a possibility that somatosensory input from DN manipulation of spastic tissue contributes to an elevation in glutamate receptor concentration within the motor cortex, consequently augmenting ICF [31]. These results may prompt the hypothesis that heightened cortical excitability might play a role in reducing spasticity as reflected in significant improvement of spasticity in this patient with MS [32]. Our results showed the increase in ICF and MEP, and the decrease in RMT that indicated the increases in cortical excitability. Furthermore, SICI increased during the three sessions. The ICF/SICI ratio, as a parameter of excitability, also did not change noticeably. To justify these results, the following explanations should be noted. (1) The lower limb motor area in brain stimulation is very tiny in comparison with the upper extremity [33], so determining SICI (as an inhibition parameter with small amounts) is more difficult than usual studies. (2) Stimulation intensity and frequency can influence the ICF/SICI ratio parameter [34]. (3) Patient fatigue, as the most frequent problem in patients with MS, can influence increased SICI levels [35]. In the spasticity results, the reduction in spasticity observed in this MS case, in line with previous reports, validates the positive impact of DN on spasticity [9, 36, 37]. Improvements in ankle active and passive flexion ROM may be attributed to improvements in both spasticity and cortical excitability.

Conclusion

This case study presented a patient with MS who underwent DN of ankle plantar flexors with severe spasticity, and highlighted the successful use of DN in the management of spasticity, ankle dorsiflexion, and cortical excitability. Further rigorous investigations are warranted, employing randomized controlled trials with a sufficient sample of patients with MS.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included.

Abbreviations

MS:

Multiple sclerosis

DN:

Dry needling

ROM:

Range of motion

SICI:

Short interval intracortical inhibition

ICF:

Intracortical facilitation

RMT:

Rest motor threshold

References

  1. Morley A, Tod A, Cramp M, Mawson S. The meaning of spasticity to people with multiple sclerosis: what can health professionals learn? Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(15):1284–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barnes MP, Kent RM, Semlyen JK, McMullen KM. Spasticity in multiple sclerosis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003;17(1):66–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Luque-Moreno C, Garvey-Canivell G, Cano-Bravo F. Analysis and rehabilitation of balance and gait in a patient with multiple sclerosis. Revista Científica de la Sociedad de Enfermería Neurológica (English ed). 2018;48:28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Honeine JL, Schieppati M, Gagey O, Do MC. The functional role of the triceps surae muscle during human locomotion. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(1): e52943.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Park H-K, Yu K-G, Shin J-H, Lee W-H. Correlation among triceps surae muscle structure, balance, and gait in persons with stroke. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci. 2020;9(3):155–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Izquierdo G. Multiple sclerosis symptoms and spasticity management: new data. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2017;7(6s):7–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chys M, De Meulemeester K, De Greef I, Murillo C, Kindt W, Kouzouz Y, et al. Clinical effectiveness of dry needling in patients with musculoskeletal pain-an umbrella review. J Clin Med. 2023;12(3):1205.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Cruz-Montecinos C, Núñez-Cortés R, Bruna-Melo T, Tapia C, Becerra P, Pavez N, et al. Dry needling technique decreases spasticity and improves general functioning in incomplete spinal cord injury: a case report. J Spinal Cord Med. 2020;43(3):414–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. del Pilar P-T, González-Platas M, Pérez-Martín MY, Revert-Gironés MC, González-Platas J. Dry needling for treating spasticity in multiple sclerosis. J Phys Ther Sci. 2021;33(7):505–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sánchez-Mila Z, Salom-Moreno J, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C. Effects of dry needling on post-stroke spasticity, motor function and stability limits: a randomised clinical trial. Acupunct Med. 2018;36(6):358–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ebrahimzadeh M, Ansari NN, Abdollahi I, Akhbari B, Monjezi S. Effects of dry needling on connectivity of corticospinal tract, spasticity, and function of upper extremity in people with stroke: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. J Acupunct Meridian Stud. 2021;14(6):238–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chou LW, Kao MJ, Lin JG. Probable mechanisms of needling therapies for myofascial pain control. Evid Based Complement Altern Med. 2012;2012: 705327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cagnie B, Dewitte V, Barbe T, Timmermans F, Delrue N, Meeus M. Physiologic effects of dry needling. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2013;17(8):348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hsieh YL, Chou LW, Joe YS, Hong CZ. Spinal cord mechanism involving the remote effects of dry needling on the irritability of myofascial trigger spots in rabbit skeletal muscle. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(7):1098–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kelly NF, Mansfield CJ, Schneider E, Moeller JC, Bleacher JS, Prakash RS, et al. Functional connectivity patterns are altered by low back pain and cause different responses to sham and real dry needling therapies: a systematic review of fMRI studies. Physiother Theory Pract. 2022. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1080/09593985.2022.2155094.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mohammadpour F, Ali Oghabian M, Nakhostin Ansari N, Naghdi S, Dommerholt J. Effects of dry needling on post-stroke brain activity and muscle spasticity of the upper limb: a case report. Acupunct Med. 2021;39(1):69–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Salehinejad MA, Wischnewski M, Ghanavati E, Mosayebi-Samani M, Kuo MF, Nitsche MA. Cognitive functions and underlying parameters of human brain physiology are associated with chronotype. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):4672.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Matsumoto A, Liang N, Ueda H, Irie K. Corticospinal excitability of the lower limb muscles during the anticipatory postural adjustments: a TMS study during dart throwing. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021;15: 703377.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Turco CV, Nelson AJ. Transcranial magnetic stimulation to assess exercise-induced neuroplasticity. Front Neuroergonomics. 2021;2: 679033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Eldaief MC, Dickerson BC, Camprodon JA. Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the neurological patient: scientific principles and applications. Semin Neurol. 2022;42(2):149–57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Dunning J, Butts R, Mourad F, Young I, Flannagan S, Perreault T. Dry needling: a literature review with implications for clinical practice guidelines. Phys Ther Rev. 2014;19(4):252–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ansari NN, Naghdi S, Moammeri H, Jalaie S. Ashworth Scales are unreliable for the assessment of muscle spasticity. Physiother Theory Pract. 2006;22(3):119–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Babazadeh-Zavieh SS, Ansari NN, Ghotbi N, Naghdi S, Haeri SMJ, Shaw BS, et al. Effects of dry needling and exercise therapy on post-stroke spasticity and motor Function-Protocol of randomized clinical trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022;28: 100921.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Motamedzadeh O, Ansari NN, Naghdi S, Azimi A, Mahmoudzadeh A, Calvo S, et al. A study on the effects of dry needling in multiple sclerosis patients with spasticity: protocol of a randomized waitlist-controlled trial. J Acupunct Meridian Stud. 2021;14(2):82–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Muellbacher W, Ziemann U, Boroojerdi B, Hallett M. Effects of low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor excitability and basic motor behavior. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;111(6):1002–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen M, Lixandrão MC, Prudente CN, Summers RLS, Kimberley TJ. Short interval intracortical inhibition responses to low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation under multiple interstimulus intervals and conditioning intensities. Neuromodulation. 2018;21(4):368–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Valera-Calero JA, Laguna-Rastrojo L, de-Jesús-Franco F, Cimadevilla-Fernández-Pola E, Cleland JA, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, et al. Prediction model of soleus muscle depth based on anthropometric features: potential applications for dry needling. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). 2020;10(5):284.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Ansari NN, Naghdi S, Fakhari Z, Radinmehr H, Hasson S. Dry needling for the treatment of poststroke muscle spasticity: a prospective case report. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;36(1):61–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Asadi B, Fard KR, Ansari NN, Marco Á, Calvo S, Herrero P. The effect of dry needling in chronic stroke with a complex network approach: a case study. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2023;54(2):179–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Asadi B, Cuenca-Zaldivar JN, Nakhostin Ansari N, Ibáñez J, Herrero P, Calvo S. Brain analysis with a complex network approach in stroke patients based on electroencephalography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Healthcare. 2023;11(5):666.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Xie M, Pallegar PN, Parusel S, Nguyen AT, Wu L-J. Regulation of cortical hyperexcitability in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: focusing on glial mechanisms. Mol Neurodegener. 2023;18(1):75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen CL, Chen CY, Chen HC, Wu CY, Lin KC, Hsieh YW, et al. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with stroke. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2019;55(6):754–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kesar TM, Stinear JW, Wolf SL. The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation to evaluate cortical excitability of lower limb musculature: challenges and opportunities. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2018;36(3):333–48.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Tugin S, Souza VH, Nazarova MA, Novikov PA, Tervo AE, Nieminen JO, et al. Effect of stimulus orientation and intensity on short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (SICF): a multi-channel transcranial magnetic stimulation study. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(9): e0257554.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Hunter SK, McNeil CJ, Butler JE, Gandevia SC, Taylor JL. Short-interval cortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation during submaximal voluntary contractions changes with fatigue. Exp Brain Res. 2016;234(9):2541–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Khalifeloo M, Naghdi S, Ansari NN, Dommerholt J, Sahraian MA. Dry needling for the treatment of muscle spasticity in a patient with multiple sclerosis: a case report. Physiother Theory Pract. 2021;38:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Luque-Moreno C, Granja-Domínguez A, Moral-Munoz JA, Izquierdo-Ayuso G, Lucena-Anton D, Heredia-Rizo AM. Effectiveness of dry needling versus placebo on gait performance, spasticity, electromyographic activity, pain, range-of-movement and quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial protocol. Brain Sci. 2020;10(12):997.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to the National Brain Mapping Laboratory and the patient who provided her permission for the publication of this case study.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HC was responsible for methodology, data collection, and writing manuscript draft; NG for study design and supervision and manuscript editing; and NNA for study design and supervision and manuscript editing. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nastaran Ghotbi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This case study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR.TUMS.FNM.REC.1401.167). This case study is a preliminary one from a larger RCT that is underway.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors have declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choobsaz, H., Ghotbi, N. & Ansari, N.N. Effects of dry needling on spasticity, cortical excitability, and range of motion in a patient with multiple sclerosis: a case report. J Med Case Reports 18, 125 (2024). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13256-024-04452-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13256-024-04452-z

Keywords