Skip to main content

Conjoined lumbosacral nerve root: a case report

Abstract

Background

In patients with conjoined nerve roots, hemilaminectomy with sufficient exposure of the intervertebral foramen or lateral recess is required to prevent destabilization and ensure correct mobility of the lumbosacral spine. To the best of our knowledge, no case reports have detailed the long-term course of conjoined nerve roots after surgery.

Case presentation

We report the case of a 51-year-old Japanese man with a conjoined nerve root. The main symptoms were acute low back pain, radiating pain, and right leg muscle weakness. Partial laminectomy was performed with adequate exposure to the conjoined nerve root. The symptoms completely resolved immediately after surgery. However, the same symptoms recurred 7 years postoperatively. The nerve root was compressed because of foraminal stenosis resulting from L5–S disc degeneration. L5–S transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion was performed on the contralateral side because of an immobile conjoined nerve root. At 44 months after the second surgery, the patient had no low back pain or radiating pain, and the muscle weakness in the right leg had improved.

Conclusions

This is the first report of the long-term course of conjoined nerve root after partial laminectomy. When foraminal stenosis occurs after partial laminectomy, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion from the contralateral side may be required because of an immobile conjoined nerve root.

Peer Review reports

Background

Conjoined nerve root (CNR) is an embryological nerve root anomaly that primarily affects the lumbosacral region. Anomalous roots are primarily bifid, conjoined structures arising from a wide area of the dura. Due to their size and attachment to surrounding structures, these roots are uniquely susceptible to trauma. The effects of compression and entrapment are amplified in the presence of lateral recess stenosis, in which developmental changes and disc herniation reduce the available reserve space [1]. In patients with CNR, adequate exposure of the roots may be required to prevent persistent compression and reduce traction. Therefore, hemilaminectomy should be performed with sufficient exposure of the intervertebral foramen or lateral recess to prevent deleterious alterations in stability and ensure correct mobility of the lumbosacral spine [2]. To the best of our knowledge, no case reports have detailed the long-term course of CNR after surgery. Here, we report the long-term course of CNR in a patient who underwent partial laminectomy.

Case presentation

A 51-year-old Japanese man with no relevant medical history visited a local doctor because of acute lower back pain and radiating pain in the right leg. He had no apparent history of trauma or other triggering events. He was employed, had no relevant family history, and had no history of tobacco smoking or alcohol consumption. He received a sacral epidural block but was referred to our department when it failed to provide relief from pain. Neurological examination revealed a positive straight-leg-raising test result at 80° on the right side. Manual muscle examination revealed weakness in the right leg (tibialis anterior, 3/5; extensor hallucis longus, 3/5; flexor hallucis longus, 4/5; and triceps surae, 4/5). The right patellar tendon reflex was normal, and the right Achilles tendon reflex was slightly diminished. Hypoesthesia was observed in the right L5 dermatome. Neurologically, these results indicate L5 nerve root impairment.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed no disc herniation; however, a right conjoined lumbosacral nerve root was observed on T2-weighted imaging, and no foraminal stenosis was observed on T1-weighted imaging. The location of the right L5 nerve root in the intervertebral foramen was significantly lower than that of the left L5 nerve root, and the right L5 nerve root joined the common trunk with the S1 nerve root. The right S1 nerve root branched more proximally than the left S1 nerve root (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Magnetic resonance imaging findings showing no disc herniation on T2-weighted imaging (a L4–5 axial; b L5–S axial), no foraminal stenosis on T1-weighted imaging (c right sagittal; d central sagittal; e left sagittal), and a right conjoined lumbosacral nerve root (white solid arrow and white outline arrow) on T2-weighted imaging (fi coronal). The right L5 nerve root (white solid arrow) is located significantly lower in the intervertebral foramen than the left L5 nerve root (white solid triangle) and joins a common trunk with the S1 nerve root (white outline arrow). The right S1 nerve root branches more proximally than the left S1 nerve root (white outline triangle). MRI magnetic resonance imaging

He was diagnosed with CNR and administered analgesics and antiinflammatory drugs, and a selective nerve root block was performed. However, after 1 month, the pain did not improve, and we performed a partial laminectomy. Laboratory assessments showed no signs of an inflammatory reaction (C-reactive protein 0.09 mg/L, white blood cell count 4.0 × 109/L, and platelet count 212 × 109/L). Laboratory assessment of the liver and renal function showed no abnormalities [aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 29 U/L, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 39 U/L, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) 170 U/L, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) 17.8 mg/dL, and creatinine 0.83 mg/dL]. Urine, serological, and microbiological analyses revealed no abnormalities. His body temperature was 36.7 °C, his pulse rate was 56 beats per minute, and his blood pressure was 125/69 mm/Hg at the time of admission. Intraoperatively, we discovered that the right L5 root originated from the caudal level of the L5 pedicle and was conjoined with the right S1 nerve root. The CNR was decompressed by resecting the facet joint. Postoperative three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) demonstrated successful partial laminectomy. The right L4–5 and L5–S facet joints were partially resected (Fig. 2). Immediately after surgery, the symptoms completely resolved. However, the same symptoms recurred 7 years postoperatively. MRI did not show disc herniation on T2-weighted images, but T1-weighted images revealed right L5–S foraminal stenosis. The right L5 nerve root (the conjoined nerve root) was compressed owing to right foraminal stenosis from L5–S disc degeneration (Fig. 3). A neurological examination revealed a negative right straight-leg raising test. Manual muscle examination revealed weakness of the right leg (tibialis anterior, 3/5; extensor hallucis longus, 3/5). The right patellar and right Achilles tendon reflexes were normal. Hypoesthesia was observed in the right L5 dermatome. Neurologically, these results indicate an L5 nerve root impairment. He was diagnosed with right L5–S foraminal stenosis, administered analgesics and antiinflammatory drugs, and underwent a sacral epidural selective nerve root block. However, his pain did not improve after 3 months, and we performed L5–S transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Laboratory assessments showed no signs of an inflammatory reaction (C-reactive protein 0.10 mg/L, white blood cell count 5.5 × 109/L, and platelet count 204 × 109/L). Laboratory assessments of liver and renal function showed no abnormalities (AST 28 U/L, ALT 38 U/L, ALP 176 U/L, BUN 18.4 mg/dL, and creatinine 0.81 mg/dL). Urine, serological, and microbiological analyses revealed no abnormalities. His body temperature was 36.5 °C, his pulse rate was 53 beats per minute, and his blood pressure was 106/72 mm/Hg at the time of the second admission. In the second surgery, a right L5–S facetectomy revealed that the right CNR crossed the L5–S disc space, and there was marked swelling of the right CNR that made it immobile. To perform TLIF, the right CNR must be safely retracted medially, the intervertebral disc should be removed, and a cage measuring 11 mm in height and 10 mm in width should be inserted into the L5–S disc space. We judged that if we created that space through surgical techniques, there would be a high risk of excessive traction and damage to the right CNR; therefore, we abandoned the insertion from the left side and performed TLIF from the contralateral side (Fig. 4). Immediately after surgery, the symptoms completely resolved.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Postoperative 3D-CT demonstrating successful partial laminectomy (a posterior view; b oblique view). The right L4–5 facet joint (white arrow) and L5–S facet joint (black arrow) are partially resected. 3D-CT three-dimensional computed tomography

Fig. 3
figure 3

MRI showing no disc herniation on T2-weighted imaging (a L4–5 axial; b L5–S axial), right L5–S foraminal stenosis on T1-weighted imaging (c right sagittal; d central sagittal; e left sagittal), and right CNR (white solid arrow and white outline arrow) on T2-weighted imaging (fi coronal). The right CNR (white solid arrow) is compressed due to right foraminal stenosis resulting from L5–S disc degeneration. CNR conjoined nerve root; MRI magnetic resonance imaging

Fig. 4
figure 4

Right CNR (white arrow) crossing the L5–S disc space (heavy six-pointed black star). The right CNR is markedly swollen and cannot be safely mobilized (a intraoperative findings). Postoperative X-ray demonstrates successful L5–S TLIF (b AP view; c lateral view). CNR conjoined nerve root; TLIF transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

At the time of writing this report, 44 months after the second surgery, the patient has no lower back or radiating pain, and the muscle weakness in the right leg has improved.

Discussion and conclusions

In patients with conjoined nerve roots (CNRs), hemilaminectomy should be performed with sufficient exposure of the intervertebral foramen or lateral recess to prevent destabilization and ensure the correct mobility of the lumbosacral spine [2]. To the best of our knowledge, no case reports have detailed the long-term course of CNR after surgery.

The incidence of CNR is reportedly 2–17.3% [2,3,4]. The CNR is composed of two adjacent nerve roots sharing a common dural envelope after exiting the thecal sac [5]. Nerve root anomalies are known differential diagnoses of herniated intervertebral discs [2]. In recent case reports, CNR was not diagnosed using preoperative imaging during the management of CNR accompanied by lumbar disc herniation [6, 7]. Symptomatic undiagnosed CNR is a cause of failed back surgery because a simple discectomy without adequate decompression of the lateral recess and intervertebral foramen does not address the pathology [2, 5]. Furthermore, an inadvertent nerve root injury or battered nerve root syndrome can occur if a second nerve is not observed in the field. The pathoanatomy of CNR resulted from the focal stenosis of the lateral recess and intervertebral foramen. Creating room for increased nerve tissue in the root exit zone and intervertebral foramen is of central importance during treatment. Several surgical procedures, such as pediculectomy and facetectomy, have been described as treatments for CNR [1, 5, 8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. These treatment approaches aim to achieve adequate decompression. Lumbar root anomalies have been defined in detail by Neidre and MacNab [10]. Three groups were defined on the basis of the nerve position at the exit of the dura. Type 1A involves CNR originating from the rostral nerve root rather than the thecal sac. Type 1B involves CNR arising from the thecal sac near the caudal nerve root. Type 2A involves two separate nerve roots exiting the same neural foramen, leaving one neural foramen unoccupied. Type 2B involves two nerve roots exiting one neural foramen, with all the other foramina occupied. Finally, Type 3 involves two adjacent nerve roots with an anastomosis between them. According to this classification system, our case was Type 1B, with the cranial nerve root exiting at a right angle to the dural sheath, similar to the cervical nerve root that exits the dural sheath. In the second surgery, the right CNR crossed the L5–S disc space, and there was marked swelling of the right CNR that made it immobile. To perform TLIF, the right CNR must be safely retracted. We judged that if we created that space through surgical techniques, there would be a high risk of excessive traction and damage to the right CNR; therefore, we abandoned the insertion from the left side and performed TLIF from the contralateral side.

With advances in diagnostic modalities, reports on CNR are increasing. MRI-based diagnosis of CNR is based on indirect imaging signs, such as dural asymmetry (corner sign), atypical extradural fat (fat crescent sign), or angulation of the exiting nerve root (parallel sign) [15]. These indirect signs are non-specific and can be mimicked by disc herniation or extradural lesions [16]. However, newer diagnostic tools, such as MR neurography [17] and oblique lumbar MRI [18], can directly demonstrate CNR.

To the best of our knowledge, there are no case reports that detail the long-term course after surgery for CNR. Our patient underwent partial laminectomy with adequate exposure of the CNR. The symptoms resolved effectively and promptly after surgery. However, the same symptoms recurred 7 years postoperatively. The CNR was compressed due to foraminal stenosis resulting from L5–S disc degeneration. L5–S TLIF was performed on the contralateral side because of the immobile CNR. The patient had no low back or radiating pain, and the muscle weakness in the right leg improved for at least 44 months after the second surgery.

In our second surgery, TLIF was performed from the contralateral side because of the immobile CNR. Herein, we report the first case describing the long-term course of CNR after partial laminectomy with adequate exposure. When foraminal stenosis occurs after partial laminectomy, TLIF from the contralateral side may be required in cases of an immobile CNR.

Further studies with larger sample sizes are required to elucidate this crucial topic.

Availability of data and materials

Medical imaging data will not be shared because it is not fully anonymous.

Abbreviations

3D-CT:

Three-dimensional computed tomography

CNR:

conjoined nerve root

MRI:

magnetic resonance imaging

TLIF:

transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

References

  1. Epstein JA, Carras R, Ferrar J, Hyman RA, Khan A. Conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots: management of herniated discs and lateral recess stenosis in patients with this anomaly. J Neurosurg. 1981;55:585–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3171/jns.1981.55.4.0585.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Artico M, Carloia S, Piacentini M, Ferretti G, Dazzi M, Franchitto S, et al. Conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots: observations on three cases and review of the literature. Neurocirugia. 2006;17:54–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/s1130-1473(06)70370-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Broom MJ. Congenital anomalies of the lumbosacral spine causing nerve root entrapment: the role of high resolution CT in diagnosis. Orthopedics. 1994;17:63–7. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3928/0147-7447-19940101-11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Aota Y, Saito Y, Yoshikawa K, Asada T, Kondo S, Watanabe K. Presurgical identification of extradural nerve root anomalies by coronal fat-suppressed magnetic resonance imaging: a report of six cases and a review of the literature. J Spinal Disord. 1997;10:167–75. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/00002517-199704000-00010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Scuderi GJ, Vaccaro AR, Brusovanik GV, Kwon BK, Berta SC. Conjoined lumbar nerve roots: a frequently underappreciated congenital abnormality. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004;17:86–93. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/00024720-200404000-00002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lightsey HM, Xiong GX, Schoenfeld AJ, Simpson AK. Microendoscopic decompression of conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots. BMJ Case Rep. 2022;15: e248680. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1136/bcr-2021-248680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuroki H, Nagai T. Conjoined nerve root in a patient with lumbar disc herniation accompanied by a lumbosacral spine anomaly: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2023;17:82. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13256-022-03749-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. White JG 3rd, Strait TA, Binkley JR, Hunter SE. Surgical treatment of 63 cases of conjoined nerve roots. J Neurosurg. 1982;56:114–7. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3171/jns.1982.56.1.0114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Postacchini F, Urso S, Ferro L. Lumbosacral nerve-root anomalies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:721–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.2106/00004623-198264050-00009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Neidre A, MacNab I. Anomalies of the lumbosacral nerve roots. Review of 16 cases and classification. Spine. 1983;8:294–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/00007632-198304000-00010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stambough JL, Balderston RA, Booth RE, Rothman RH. Surgical management of sciatica involving anomalous lumbar nerve roots. J Spinal Disord. 1988;1:111–4. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/00002517-198801020-00002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maiuri F, Gambardella A. Anomalies of the lumbosacral nerve roots. Neurol Res. 1989;11:130–5. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1080/01616412.1989.11739877.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Prestar FJ. Anomalies and malformations of lumbar spinal nerve roots. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 1996;39:133–7. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1055/s-2008-1052233.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Taghipour M, Razmkon A, Hosseini K. Conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots: analysis of cases diagnosed intraoperatively. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009;22:413–6. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/BSD.0b013e31818f00a0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Song SJ, Lee JW, Choi JY, Hong SH, Kim NR, Kim KJ, et al. Imaging features suggestive of a conjoined nerve root on routine axial MRI. Skeletal Radiol. 2008;37:133–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s00256-007-0403-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sharma A, Singh V, Agrawal R, Mangale N, Deepak P, Savla J, et al. 2021. Conjoint nerve root an intraoperative challenge in minimally invasive tubular discectomy. Asian Spine J. 15: 545–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.31616/asj.2020.0250

  17. Engar C, Wadhwa V, Weinberg B, Chhabra A. Conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots: direct demonstration on MR neurography. Clin Imaging. 2014;38:892–4. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.07.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Heo DH, Kim SW, Chang HH, Park CK. Usefulness of oblique lumbar magnetic resonance imaging for nerve root anomalies and extraforaminal entrapment lesions. Asian Spine J. 2018;12:423–7. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.4184/asj.2018.12.3.423.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable. No assistance was provided in the writing of this manuscript.

Funding

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YT and HH performed the surgeries. YT, HY, HE, HH, HI, KT, YR, AM, YK, AN, TY, and HT designed the treatment plans. YT conducted the follow-up. YT wrote the draft of the manuscript, which was revised by HT. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasutaka Takagi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the Tonami General Hospital research ethics committee.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and the accompanying images. A copy of the written consent form is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests pertaining to this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takagi, Y., Yamada, H., Ebara, H. et al. Conjoined lumbosacral nerve root: a case report. J Med Case Reports 18, 91 (2024). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13256-024-04415-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13256-024-04415-4

Keywords