Skip to main content

Spontaneous knot formation complication of double J: two case reports

Abstract

Background

Use of ureteral stents has become an integral part of urological practice. However, it also brought with it many complications. Double J (DJ) stent knotting is a rare stent complication, and only a few cases have been reported in the literature. Although the exact cause is unknown and, in the literature, it is generally thought that knots occur due to traction. In this case report we present for the first time that spontaneous knots can occur due to ureteral peristalsis or ureteral anomalies.

Case presentation

Two patients (67 and 35 aged-Caucasian person) with ureteral stones who presented to the emergency department with colicky pain and had no previous history of urological surgery. We observed knot formation in the routine urinary system radiographs taken before stent removal in two patients whose ureters were observed to be narrow during endoscopic ureteral stone treatment. The stents were successfully removed using gentle traction under general anesthesia.

Conclusions

We discussed the cause and solution of spontaneous knot formation. We emphasized the importance of the direct urinary system radiograph taken before DJ stent removal.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The ureteral stents, which become an integral part of modern urological practice, provide urinary tract access, dilation of urinary strictures, removal of kidney stones, and temporary drainage of urine. There are various size (14–32 cm), diameter (3–8 F), hardness, body, tip shapes (pigtail, double pigtail-JJ) and coating (carbon, hydrophilic, heparin) ingredients for the purpose of use.

During their time with ureteral stents, 80% of patients report experiencing some degree of discomfort. Additionally, the use of ureteral stents may lead to serious complications such as stent migration and stent encrustation. Although spontaneous knotting of the ureteral stent has been reported before, it is one of the rare complications in the literature. There are a variety of techniques reported for the removal of a knotted double J (DJ) stent, from simple traction to open surgery.

Case report

The first case, a 67-year-old man (Caucasian), applied to our clinic with a complaint of left side pain that had been going on for a month. On physical examination, positive left costovertebral angle (CVA) tenderness was observed (Table 1). He had hypertension and diabetes. There was a stone disease in his father. The patient had no previous history of renal colic, urinary system stone disease or any surgical intervention. In the imaging performed for the patient, “Grade 2 ectasia in the upper collecting system of the left kidney, double ureter appearance on the left and suspicious stone image at the level of the left iliac crossover” was observed; ureterorenoscopy (URS) was planned for the patient. During cystoscopy, a close monitoring of the patient’s left ureteral orifice revealed an attempt to insert a sensor guide. However, it failed to transition from the middle ureter to the proximity. Then, the distal ureter was entered through the left ureteral orifice by applying ureteral balloon dilation under the guidance of a sensor guide. The ureter at the iliac cross level was passed with difficulty, but due to stenosis, it could not be advanced further proximally; 4.8 Fr 26 cm DJ was placed and it was seen that both ends were bent under fluoroscopy.

Table 1 Timeline

The second case (Caucasian), aged 35, had complaints of right-side pain for four months. On physical examination, positive right CVA tenderness was observed (Table 1). The patient had no comorbidity. There was a stone disease in his family. A calculus of 3–4 mm in size was observed in the right distal ureter in the imaging performed on the patient, who had a previous history of passing spontaneous urinary system stones but did not have a previous surgical history. During the URS procedure performed 2 weeks later, annular stenosis was observed 2 cm ahead of the right orifice and was corrected with balloon dilatation. Endoscopic ureteral stone treatment was performed with holmium laser. At the end of the surgery, a 4.8 Fr 26 cm DJ was placed into the right ureter and the procedure was terminated. No perioperative or postoperative complications were observed in both cases, and the urinary system was visualized on the radiography on the first day after the operation (Fig. 1A, B).

Fig. 1
figure 1

A Case 1 direct urinary system graphic after Ureterorenoscopy. B Case 2 direct urinary system graphic after Ureterorenoscopy

In both cases, when the urinary system radiographs were repeated six weeks later for routine DJ stent removal; spontaneous knotting was observed at the proximal end of the DJ stents (Fig. 2A, B). Both of patients no bothersome symptoms were reported, and the physical examination was strictly normal. Considering the possibility that the procedure could be complicated, DJ stent removal was planned under general anesthesia. After the distal coil of the DJ stents was corrected, gentle traction was applied toward the contralateral bladder wall. DJ stents were barely removed without complications, and proximal ends were found to be coming in knotted (Fig. 3A, B). A 7Fr ureteral catheter was placed over the guide wire to the renal pelvis. The ureteral catheter was removed on postoperative day 1; After observation, the patient was discharged with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAII) and antibiotic treatment.

Fig. 2
figure 2

A Case 1 direct urinary system graphic taken before Double J removal. B Case 2 direct urinary system graphic taken before Double J removal

Fig. 3
figure 3

A Case 1 Double J ureteral stent with knot formation at proximal end. B Case 2 Double J ureteral stent with knot formation at proximal end

Discussion

Ureteral DJ stent complications include irritative micturition symptoms, suprapubic pain, costovertebral pain, vesicorenal reflux, stent malposition, hematuria, urinary tract infection, fever, encrustation, stent migration, stent rupture, ureteral perforation, erosion and fistulization. To our best knowledge, only a few cases have been identified in the literature since Groeneveld et al. first reported it in 1989 [1]. Table 2 summarized the previously recent published cases regarding DJ stent knotting. Knotted formation is a rare complication, with only 40 cases being described and can be vexing to manage. In the vast majority of reported cases (92.5%), knotting was observed at the proximal end of the DJ stent. In our patients and in the majority of other cases of knotting, the patients were asymptomatic and the cases typically presented with unexpected resistance during DJ stent removal.

Table 2 Literature review of knot formation

In the majority of reported cases, no abnormal appearance was detected in the urinary system radiograph taken before stent removal [2], which would suggest knotting in the DJ stent; it has been stated that the knot may form due to traction during extraction. However, in our cases, knot formation was observed to develop spontaneously immediately after URS, without any intervention or traction. This suggests that knot formation may develop due to the ureter’s own peristalsis or secondary to balloon dilatation applied to the abnormal ureter.

In approximately one-third of reported cases, the DJ stent could be removed with gentle traction and the condition was treated successfully [3]. However, this procedure carries risks for these patients as it may make the existing knot tighter and increase the degree of complications. If strong resistance is encountered during DJ stent removal, alternative interventions should be considered to avoid causing serious ureteral trauma or loss of renal function [3]. In previous years, “the use of sterile Vaseline in addition to traction” has been tried; There are suggestions such as “securing the distal end of the DJ catheter to the leg with a catheter band and providing continuous traction for 3 days” or “applying extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) to the migrated area of the knotted stent” [4].

In another case where knot formation was observed twice in the same patient, no additional intervention was required to open the second knot formation; spontaneous resolution of the node has been associated with the Valsalva effect achieved by recurrent severe coughs [5]. Valsalva has been suggested as an easy and harmless treatment before invasive procedures for removing knotted stents.

Baldwin et al. used an “Amplatz 0.038 super stiff guidewire” at the proximal end of the stent to solve knot formation [6]. Flam et al. placed a second ureteral stent next to the knotted stent, and a week later, the stent was removed with 5Fr alligator forceps [7]. Endourologically, breaking down the knot formation with a holmium laser and removing the stent has been suggested in the literature as another method [8]. Removal of knot-forming stents via percutaneous or open surgery should only be performed after failure with other techniques. Urologists should be aware of the possibility of knot formation in the stent if difficulty is encountered during stent removal.

Conclusion

Although the literature shows that a knot can occur with traction during DJ stent removal, we also believe that a spontaneous node may be caused by ureteral peristalsis or ureteral anomalies. Therefore, the routine use of a urinary system graph (X) for all patients before the release of the DJ stent can prevent potential complications due to spontaneous knot formation.

Even if we do not see knot formation on the x-ray, in all cases with ureteral stent in which difficulty is experienced during removal, the possibility of stent knotting should always be kept in mind and therapy planned accordingly.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

CVA:

Costovertebral angle

DJ:

Double J

ESWL:

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

NSAII:

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug

PCN:

Percutaneous nephrostomy

URS:

Ureterorenoscopy

References

  1. Groeneveld AE. The role of ESWL in the treatment of large kidney stones. Singap Med J. 1989;30(3):249–54.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jendouzi O, Lamghari A, Jamali M, Harchaoui A, Alami M, Ameur A. Knotted double J ureteral stent: a case report and literature review. Pan Afr Med J. 2022;5(43):5. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.11604/pamj.2022.43.5.34538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bradshaw J, Khan A, Adiotomre E, Burbidge S, Biyani CS. Antegrade removal of a knotted ureteric stent: case report and review of literature. Urol Ann. 2020;12(1):96–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sighinolfi MC, De Stefani S, Micali S, Mofferdin A, Baisi B, Celia A, et al. A knotted multi-length ureteral stent: a rare complication. Urol Res. 2005;33(1):70–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eisner B, Kim H, Sacco D. Repeat knot formation in a patient with an indwelling ureteral stent. Int Braz J Urol. 2006;32(3):308–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Baldwin DD, Juriansz GJ, Stewart S, Hadley R. Knotted ureteral stent: a minimally invasive technique for removal. J Urol. 1998;159(6):2065–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Flam TA, Thiounn N, Gerbaud PF, Zerbib M, Debré B. Knotting of a double pigtail stent within the ureter: an initial report. J Urol. 1995;154(5):1858–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahmadi N, Tran M, Elms M, Ko R. Knotted proximal loop of ureteric stents: teview of the literature and five case reports. J Clin Urol. 2015;8(6):432–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Das G, Wickham JE. Knotted ureteric stent: an unusual urological complication. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1990;35:190.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Braslis KG, Joyce G. Spontaneous knotting of a pigtail ureteric stent in the ureter requiring percutaneous removal. Aust N Z J Surg. 1992;62:825–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kundargi P, Bansal M, Pattnaik PK. Knotted upper end: a new complication in the use of an indwelling ureteral stent. J Urol. 1994;151:995–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Quek ML, Dunn MD. Knot formation at the mid portion of an indwelling ureteral stent. J Urol. 2002;168(4 Pt 1):1497.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kondo N, Yoshino Y, Shiono Y, Hasegawa Y. A case demonstrating knot formation at the upper end of a ureteral stent. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2005;51:385–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Basavaraj DR, Gill K, Biyani CS. Case report: knotted ureteral stent in patient with ileal conduit: conservative approach for retrieval. J Endourol. 2007;21:90–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rivalta M, Sighinolfi MC, Micali S, De Stefani S, Bianchi G. Knotted ureteral catheter in an 83-year-old man: case presentation and urological non-invasive management in the elderly. Urol Res. 2009;37:261–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Picozzi S, Carmignani L. A knotted ureteral stent: a case report and review of the literature. Urol Ann. 2010;2:80–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Tempest H, Turney B, Kumar S. Novel application of an established technique for removing a knotted ureteric stent. BMJ Case Rep. 2011;2011:bcr1120103528.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Richards MM, Khalil D, Mahdy A. Successful treatment of stent knot in the proximal ureter using ureteroscopy and holmium laser. Case Rep Med. 2011;2011:502191.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Moufid K, Touiti D, Mohamed L. “Knot stent”: AN unusual cause of acute renal failure in solitary kidney. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2012;2:36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Karaguzel E, Kutlu O, Kazaz IO, Gur M, Dil E, et al. Knotted ureteral stent: a rare complication of ureteral stent usage. Urol Res. 2012;40:793–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nettle J, Huang JG, Rao R, Costello AJ. Ureteroscopic holmium laser ablation of a knotted ureteral stent. J Endourol. 2012;26:968–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bhirud P, Giridhar V, Hegde P. Midureteric knotted stent removed by percutaneous access! Urol Ann. 2012;4:106–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim MS, Lee HN, Hwang H. Knotted stents: case report and outcome analysis. Korean J Urol. 2015;56:405–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Manohar P, Kan WT, Ranasinghe WK, Cetti RJ, McCahy P. Knotted multilength ureteric stents: a case series. ANZ J Surg. 2016;86:413–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cho CL. A knotted ureteral stent. Urology Case Rep. 2020;33:101327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou Y, Chu X, Yi Y, Lei J, Huang S, Dai Y. A knotted ureteral stent in patient withrenal transplantation: a case report and literature review. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2018;11(6):6364–8.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Agarwal DK. A novel telescopic access sheath method to manage encrusted or knotted retained ureteral stents. J Endourol. 2022;36(7):989–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Gur M, Eraslan A, Mohamed AH, Mohamed AI, Mohamed KA, Cimen S. Management of a patient with a double J stent knotted at the mid-portion. Urol Case Rep. 2022;16(43):102084. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.eucr.2022.102084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Divya G, Kundal VK, Shah S, Debnath PR, Meena AK, Sen A. Complications and management of retained double-J stents in children during the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2022;27(6):735–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Weeratunga GN, Yuan L, Yassaie O, Caswell-Smith P. Case report: retrieval of knotted ureteric stent causing obstructive urosepsis. Urol Case Rep. 2023;4(46):102316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ACK: contributed to the conception and design of the case report. ACK, SA: collection of data, Revision of the manuscript, preparing figures and performing the last evaluation. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmet Can Kolu.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kolu, A.C., Akan, S. Spontaneous knot formation complication of double J: two case reports. J Med Case Reports 18, 103 (2024). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13256-024-04395-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13256-024-04395-5

Keywords